As the 2026 Indian Premier League (IPL) season approaches, the Royal Challengers Bengaluru (RCB) confirmed that Yash Dayal will not be part of their squad. This decision comes in light of serious legal allegations that have been hanging over the cricketer since July last year.

Dayal, who has been facing charges including sexual assault and exploitation, is currently embroiled in a POCSO case that is under investigation in Jaipur. The Rajasthan High Court recently denied him interim relief, further complicating his situation.

RCB’s director of cricket, Mo Bobat, stated, “Yash will not be joining the squad as he is going through a personal situation.” This statement underscores the gravity of Dayal’s legal troubles, which have kept him away from the game for an extended period.

Since the onset of these legal issues, Dayal has missed the entire domestic season for Uttar Pradesh, marking a significant setback in his career. The ongoing investigation and the nature of the allegations have cast a long shadow over his future in cricket.

Bobat emphasized the team’s support for Dayal, noting, “We’ve been very supportive of Yash to date and that’s reflected in the opportunity to either retain or release players.” This indicates that RCB is committed to standing by Dayal during this challenging time.

Despite the circumstances, RCB remains in contact with Dayal, offering him support as he navigates these personal and legal challenges. Bobat remarked, “Yash’s situation has been tricky,” highlighting the complexities involved.

The absence of Dayal from the IPL 2026 not only affects his career but also raises questions about the implications of such legal issues on professional athletes. The cricket community is watching closely as the situation unfolds.

As of now, the details surrounding the case remain unconfirmed, and the outcome could have lasting effects on Dayal’s future in the sport.

In summary, Yash Dayal’s absence from the upcoming IPL season is a stark reminder of how personal and legal matters can intertwine with professional sports, impacting not just the individual but the teams and fans involved.

The post Yash Dayal’s Absence from IPL 2026: A Deep Dive into the Ongoing Legal Troubles appeared first on NewsNationIndia.

The Rajasthan High Court has issued a significant ruling that prohibits universities, including the Rajasthan University of Health Sciences (RUHS), from imposing additional processing charges for providing certified copies of answer sheets under the Right to Information (RTI) Act. This decision aims to enhance transparency and accessibility for students seeking their evaluated answer sheets.

The Court found that the ₹1000 processing fee per application demanded by RUHS was illegal and contrary to the provisions of the RTI Act. The petitioner, Vipika, a B.Sc. Nursing student, had sought certified copies of her evaluated answer books but was faced with a total demand of ₹1225, which included the ₹1000 processing fee.

In its ruling, the Court emphasized that public authorities must adhere to the fee structure prescribed under the RTI Act. It quashed the University’s guidelines that imposed the ₹1000 processing fee, reinforcing that the fees for information sought under the RTI Act should only reflect those specified in the RTI Rules.

The Court’s decision was influenced by several Supreme Court judgments that recognize the right of examinees to access their evaluated answer sheets under the RTI Act. The ruling noted that imposing such a high processing fee could discourage students from exercising their right to information, which contradicts the objectives of the RTI Act.

The case was decided by a Division Bench comprising Justice Dr. Pushpendra Singh Bhati and Justice Sandeep Shah, with the order issued on March 6, 2026. The case number is D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13783/2021.

According to the Court, the fee payable for seeking information under the Act is already specified by statutory rules, and public authorities cannot impose additional charges that are inconsistent with those rules. This ruling is expected to set a precedent for how universities handle RTI requests in the future.

Moreover, the Court highlighted that the application fee prescribed under the RTI Act is only ₹10, while the cost for copies of documents is ₹2 per page, with an average answer book containing about 40 pages. This means that the total photocopy charges should amount to ₹80, in addition to the application fee, making the total ₹90, significantly lower than the amount previously demanded by RUHS.

The ruling also addressed the postal charges, which RUHS had set at ₹145, further inflating the total cost for students. The University manages approximately 6.5 lakh answer sheets, and this decision will impact many students seeking access to their evaluated work.

As this ruling unfolds, it remains to be seen how RUHS and other universities will adjust their policies in compliance with the Court’s directives. Details remain unconfirmed regarding any immediate changes to the fee structures or processes at RUHS following this landmark decision.

The post Ruhs: Rajasthan High Court Ruling on RTI Processing Fees Impacts appeared first on NewsNationIndia.

The Rajasthan High Court has made a significant ruling impacting students at the Rajasthan University of Health Sciences (RUHS). The Court determined that universities cannot impose additional processing charges for providing certified copies of answer sheets under the Right to Information (RTI) Act.

This decision arose from a case involving Vipika, a B.Sc. Nursing student who sought certified copies of her evaluated answer books. RUHS had demanded a total of ₹1225 for each answer book, which included an illegal ₹1000 processing fee.

The Court found this fee structure to be contrary to the RTI Act, emphasizing that the fee payable for seeking information is already specified by statutory rules. The Court quashed the University’s guidelines that imposed the ₹1000 processing fee, reinforcing that public authorities must adhere to the fee structure prescribed under the RTI Rules.

In its ruling, the Court referred to several Supreme Court decisions that recognize the right of examinees to access evaluated answer sheets under the RTI Act. The ruling is seen as a crucial step towards promoting transparency and accountability in educational institutions.

The Court highlighted that imposing a processing fee of ₹1000 appeared to be an attempt to discourage students from seeking certified copies of their answer books. Instead, the Court directed RUHS to charge only the application fee of ₹10, along with photocopy charges calculated at ₹2 per page for the 40 pages typically found in an answer book, totaling ₹80, plus ₹145 for postal charges.

This ruling aligns with the broader objectives of the RTI Act, which was enacted in 2005 to enhance transparency in public authorities. The decision is expected to empower students and ensure their right to access information regarding their academic evaluations.

As the implications of this ruling unfold, it remains to be seen how RUHS and other universities will adjust their policies in compliance with the Court’s directives. Details remain unconfirmed regarding any immediate changes to the fee structures at RUHS or other institutions.

The post Ruhs: Rajasthan High Court Ruling on Processing Fees appeared first on NewsNationIndia.