The case, titled Aman Gupta v. John Doe & Ors., saw Gupta represented by Senior Advocate Diya Kapur and Advocate Nakul Gandhi. On April 30, 2026, Justice Jyoti Singh recused herself from hearing the matter, prompting it to be scheduled for a later date.

On May 7, the case will be heard by Justice Tushar Rao Gedela. Legal documents indicate that the Delhi High Court has previously ruled in favor of various public figures seeking similar protections, addressing concerns surrounding the misuse of likeness and identity online.

Notably, this trend is not isolated to Gupta; other prominent figures such as Salman Khan and Sri Sri Ravi Shankar have also filed suits regarding their personality rights. The court has issued john doe orders in these instances to prevent unauthorized exploitation of personalities.

The rise of AI-generated content has further complicated matters related to personality rights, as it often blurs the line between legitimate use and infringement. Legal experts suggest that the court’s willingness to grant relief to public figures signals an important shift in recognizing and enforcing these rights amidst evolving digital challenges.

In light of these developments, sources indicate that the increasing misuse of likeness and identity online is becoming a pressing concern for many in the entertainment industry.

The post Aman Gupta personality rights suit appeared first on NewsNationIndia.

In her video, Thapar described namaz as a form of full-body exercise that enhances flexibility and improves blood circulation. Yet, rather than receiving support for her views, she faced a torrent of criticism and derogatory remarks directed at her—an experience she stated has persisted for three weeks. According to Thapar, this negative attention highlights a broader issue regarding the silence surrounding online abuse against women.

Thapar’s previous content had explored various faiths without inciting controversy; however, this particular instance has drawn sharp reactions. She emphasized the importance of respect across religions, stating, “Mujhe sikhaaya gaya hai, R for religion means R for respect. And is this how you respect? Especially two women.” This quote underscores her frustration with the reactions she received.

In response to the trolling, Thapar invoked the concept of karma—suggesting that those who engage in disrespectful behavior will ultimately face consequences. She articulated that “Hinduism has a concept called Karma. God is watching,” reflecting her belief in accountability. This invocation of spiritual principles may resonate with some audiences while alienating others.

Thapar’s call for respect extends beyond mere rhetoric; she urged individuals to amplify positive messages instead of contributing to negativity. She remarked, “Aapke liye koi nahi bolega. You have to speak up for yourself,” emphasizing the need for self-advocacy in the face of adversity.

The incident raises important questions about societal attitudes towards women who express their views on religious matters and the implications of online harassment. As observers consider these dynamics, it remains essential to examine the broader context of how such discussions are navigated within diverse communities.

While Thapar has previously created content on Hindu religious practices and their health benefits without facing backlash, this situation illustrates how sensitive discussions can become when they intersect with multiple faiths. Details remain unconfirmed regarding any further actions she might take in response to this incident or if there will be any lasting impact on her public persona.

The post Namita Thapar Faces Backlash Over Health Benefits of Namaz appeared first on NewsNationIndia.

Aamir Khan’s film Sitaare Zameen Par, an official remake of the Spanish film Champions, has made headlines with its recent developments. After a successful theatrical run, where it earned ₹167 crore in India, the film is now set to stream on SonyLIV.

Initially, Khan had opted for a YouTube rental model, rejecting various OTT deals that offered up to ₹125 crore for streaming rights. The rental model charged ₹100 per watch, allowing viewers to access the film directly through YouTube.

During the film’s production, Khan faced challenges, including having to buy back Sony’s 25% stake in the project. This buyout increased the production budget from ₹96 crore to approximately ₹133 crore, highlighting Khan’s commitment to the film.

The decision to shift from YouTube to SonyLIV marks a significant change in Khan’s distribution strategy, which he initially adopted to challenge industry norms. His approach has drawn attention and sparked discussions about the evolving landscape of film distribution.

In addition to Sitaare Zameen Par, SonyLIV continues to expand its content offerings. The platform features series such as Kohrra 2 and Raat Jawaan Hai, the latter starring Barun Sobti as a stay-at-home father. Sobti has expressed his enthusiasm for the role, noting the prominence of maternal instincts on set.

Meanwhile, the brand Everaw Nutrition recently appeared on Shark Tank India, presenting its clean-label children’s food products. Co-founders Lucky Soni and Yash Soni emphasized their commitment to creating products that parents can trust.

As Sitaare Zameen Par prepares for its streaming debut on SonyLIV, the film’s journey reflects broader trends in the film industry, particularly regarding distribution methods and audience engagement.

Details remain unconfirmed regarding the exact streaming date on SonyLIV, but the anticipation continues to build among fans and industry watchers alike.

The post Sonyliv: Sitaare Zameen Par Streaming on appeared first on NewsNationIndia.