The lawsuit against JPMorgan Chase executive Lorna Hajdini has been filed by John Doe in the New York Supreme Court, alleging severe misconduct including sexual harassment and abuse of authority. The complaint details a troubling pattern of behavior that reportedly began shortly after a junior male colleague joined the firm in March 2024.
The allegations specify that Hajdini made repeated sexual advances towards the complainant, alongside racially offensive remarks. In one instance, she reportedly said, “Stop f***ing crying. You think anyone would ever believe you? You’re a fing douche bag who thinks he’s hot s**t…” Such statements contribute to the gravity of the claims against her.
According to documents filed in court, Hajdini allegedly threatened Doe’s career if he did not comply with her advances, asserting her power as a senior executive. The complaint includes further claims that she made derogatory remarks about Doe’s wife and initiated unwanted sexual acts despite his resistance. These actions raise significant concerns regarding workplace culture at JPMorgan Chase.
In response to the lawsuit, JPMorgan has denied all allegations, asserting that an internal investigation found no merit in the claims. The bank’s statement reflects a commitment to upholding workplace integrity; however, it also raises questions about the thoroughness of such investigations when serious allegations arise.
Chirayu Rana, identified as John Doe in the lawsuit, alleges that Hajdini drugged him and forced him into sexual acts—a claim that adds another layer of complexity to this case. His internal complaint at JPMorgan Chase in May 2025 regarding race- and gender-based harassment indicates that these issues may not be isolated incidents but part of a broader pattern of misconduct within the organization.
Hajdini has categorically denied all allegations through her legal representatives, stating emphatically that she never engaged in any inappropriate conduct with Rana. This denial underscores the contentious nature of the case and highlights the challenges involved in resolving such disputes within corporate environments.
The case has drawn significant attention due to the serious nature of the allegations and the high-profile status of the individuals involved. Observers remain keen to see how this situation unfolds, particularly given its potential implications for workplace policies at major financial institutions like JPMorgan Chase.
